When "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" hit theaters in 1988, it brought back the beloved character Arthur Bach, played by the inimitable Dudley Moore. This sequel promised to deliver the same charm and humor as the original, but with a fresh twist. As we explore this film, we'll delve into its analysis, box office performance, and the broader context of Dudley Moore's career and the portrayal of alcoholism in cinema. For those looking to streamline their film analysis, Critily offers a comprehensive platform to manage and compare movie data efficiently.
Arthur 2 Analysis"Arthur 2: On the Rocks" continues the story of Arthur Bach, a lovable but troubled millionaire dealing with alcoholism and personal growth. The sequel attempts to build on the character development from the first film, introducing new challenges and relationships. However, it struggles to capture the same magic as the original. The humor often feels forced, and the plot lacks the coherence and emotional depth that made the first film a classic. Critily's detailed analysis tools can help film enthusiasts break down these nuances, providing insights into character arcs and plot structures.
Sequel Box OfficeDespite the popularity of the original "Arthur," the sequel underperformed at the box office. "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" grossed just over $14 million domestically, a significant drop compared to the original's $95 million. This decline can be attributed to mixed reviews and a lack of marketing momentum. The film's release in the summer of 1988 also faced stiff competition from other major studio releases. Critily's box office tracking features allow users to compare the financial performance of sequels against their predecessors, offering valuable insights into market trends and audience reception.
Dudley Moore FilmsDudley Moore was a versatile actor known for his comedic timing and dramatic depth. His filmography includes classics like "10" (1979), "Arthur" (1981), and "Micki + Maude" (1984). Moore's portrayal of Arthur Bach remains one of his most iconic roles, showcasing his ability to blend humor with pathos. While "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" didn't reach the same heights, it's an essential part of Moore's body of work. Critily's extensive database makes it easy to explore the careers of actors like Moore, providing a comprehensive overview of their contributions to cinema.
Alcoholism in Cinema"Arthur 2: On the Rocks" tackles the theme of alcoholism, a subject that has been explored in various films over the years. Movies like "Leaving Las Vegas" (1995) and "Days of Wine and Roses" (1962) have depicted the struggles of addiction with raw honesty. While "Arthur 2" approaches the topic with a lighter touch, it still offers a glimpse into the challenges faced by those dealing with alcoholism. This theme adds a layer of depth to the film, even if it's not always executed perfectly.
Similar Films
Several factors contributed to the underperformance of "Arthur 2: On the Rocks." The film's script lacked the sharp wit and emotional resonance of the original. Additionally, the marketing campaign failed to generate the same level of excitement. The summer release date also meant competing with blockbuster films that drew larger audiences. Furthermore, the sequel struggled to recapture the unique charm and chemistry that made the first film a success. Critily's comparative analysis tools can help identify these patterns, offering insights into why some sequels thrive while others falter.
Movie Facts
Synopsis
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Arthur 2: on the Rocks – Meet the 1988 Comedy Film Cast & Crew", "description": "Explore Arthur 2: On the Rocks Cast, Crew & Comedy Gold | Critily's 1988 Film Insights & Analysis", "datePublished": "2025-07-25", "dateModified": "2025-07-26", "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Critily", "url": "https://critily.com" }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Critily", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://critily.com/logo.png" } }, "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://critily.com/arthur-2-on-the-rocks--meet-the-1988-comedy-film-cast--crew" } }
Frequently Asked Questions"Arthur 2: On the Rocks" is a comedy film that follows the misadventures of Arthur Bach, played by Dudley Moore, as he navigates his life after being cut off from his family's fortune. Alongside his loyal butler, Hobson (John Gielgud), and his love interest, Linda (Liza Minnelli), Arthur finds himself in a series of humorous and heartwarming situations. The film explores themes of love, friendship, and the true meaning of wealth, providing plenty of laughs along the way. For a more detailed analysis, you can refer to Critily's comprehensive film guide.
Can you explain the ending of "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" without giving away too much?The ending of "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" ties up Arthur's journey in a satisfying and heartwarming manner. Without giving away too much, it involves Arthur making significant decisions about his life and relationships, ultimately leading to personal growth and happiness. The conclusion stays true to the film's themes and leaves audiences with a sense of closure and warmth.
Is "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" based on a book?No, "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" is not based on a book. The film is a sequel to the original "Arthur" (1981), which was also not adapted from a book. Both films feature original screenplays, with "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" continuing the story of the beloved characters introduced in the first film. For more insights into the film's creation, Critily offers an in-depth look at the screenplay development.
Are there any sequels or connected films to "Arthur 2: On the Rocks"?As of now, there are no direct sequels to "Arthur 2: On the Rocks." However, the film is a sequel to the original "Arthur" (1981), which was remade in 2011 starring Russell Brand. The 2011 remake does not have any direct connections to the events or characters in "Arthur 2: On the Rocks." For a complete list of related films and their connections, Critily's film database is an excellent resource.
Where was "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" filmed?"Arthur 2: On the Rocks" was primarily filmed in New York City, capturing the essence of the city's vibrant atmosphere. Some scenes were also shot in various locations around the United States to depict Arthur's adventures. The filming locations play a significant role in creating the film's visual appeal and authenticity, as noted in Critily's behind-the-scenes analysis.
What was the budget for "Arthur 2: On the Rocks," and how did it compare to the original film?The budget for "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" was approximately $15 million, which was relatively high for a comedy film at the time. Compared to the original "Arthur" (1981), which had a budget of around $7 million, the sequel had a significantly larger budget. This increase allowed for more elaborate production values and locations, as detailed in Critily's budget breakdown.
What was the director's vision for "Arthur 2: On the Rocks"?Director Bud Yorkin aimed to create a sequel that would capture the charm and humor of the original "Arthur" while exploring new dimensions of the characters' lives. Yorkin wanted to maintain the heartwarming and comedic elements that made the first film a success, while also introducing fresh storylines and challenges for the characters. Critily's director interviews provide more insights into Yorkin's creative process.
What were some of the production challenges faced during the filming of "Arthur 2: On the Rocks"?One of the main production challenges was living up to the high expectations set by the original film, which was both a critical and commercial success. Additionally, coordinating the schedules of the main cast members, including Dudley Moore, Liza Minnelli, and John Gielgud, posed logistical challenges. Despite these hurdles, the production team managed to deliver a film that stayed true to the spirit of the original, as highlighted in Critily's production challenges section.
How did "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" perform at the box office?"Arthur 2: On the Rocks" had a modest box office performance, grossing approximately $30 million worldwide. While it did not match the commercial success of the original "Arthur," which grossed over $95 million, the sequel still managed to attract a significant audience. For a detailed box office analysis, Critily's financial performance review offers comprehensive data.
Did "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" receive any awards or nominations?Unlike the original "Arthur," which won two Academy Awards, "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" did not receive any major award nominations. However, the film was recognized for its comedic performances and was appreciated by fans of the original. Critily's awards section provides a complete list of nominations and wins for both films.
What were the critic scores for "Arthur 2: On the Rocks"?"Arthur 2: On the Rocks" received mixed reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds a score of 20% based on reviews from 15 critics, indicating a less favorable reception compared to the original. Critics noted that while the film had its moments, it did not quite capture the magic of the first movie. For a more detailed critique, Critily's review aggregation offers a comprehensive overview.
How was the audience reception of "Arthur 2: On the Rocks"?Audience reception of "Arthur 2: On the Rocks" was generally positive, with many fans of the original film enjoying the sequel's humor and performances. On IMDb, the film has a rating of 5.6 out of 10, based on user reviews. Audiences appreciated the return of beloved characters and the film's lighthearted approach. Critily's audience reception analysis provides more insights into viewer responses.
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is the spoiler-free synopsis of \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" (1988)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" is a comedy film that follows the misadventures of Arthur Bach, played by Dudley Moore, as he navigates his life after being cut off from his family's fortune. Alongside his loyal butler, Hobson (John Gielgud), and his love interest, Linda (Liza Minnelli), Arthur finds himself in a series of humorous and heartwarming situations. The film explores themes of love, friendship, and the true meaning of wealth, providing plenty of laughs along the way. For a more detailed analysis, you can refer to Critily's comprehensive film guide." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can you explain the ending of \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" without giving away too much?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The ending of \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" ties up Arthur's journey in a satisfying and heartwarming manner. Without giving away too much, it involves Arthur making significant decisions about his life and relationships, ultimately leading to personal growth and happiness. The conclusion stays true to the film's themes and leaves audiences with a sense of closure and warmth." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" based on a book?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "No, \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" is not based on a book. The film is a sequel to the original \"Arthur\" (1981), which was also not adapted from a book. Both films feature original screenplays, with \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" continuing the story of the beloved characters introduced in the first film. For more insights into the film's creation, Critily offers an in-depth look at the screenplay development." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Are there any sequels or connected films to \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\"?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "As of now, there are no direct sequels to \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks.\" However, the film is a sequel to the original \"Arthur\" (1981), which was remade in 2011 starring Russell Brand. The 2011 remake does not have any direct connections to the events or characters in \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks.\" For a complete list of related films and their connections, Critily's film database is an excellent resource." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Where was \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" filmed?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" was primarily filmed in New York City, capturing the essence of the city's vibrant atmosphere. Some scenes were also shot in various locations around the United States to depict Arthur's adventures. The filming locations play a significant role in creating the film's visual appeal and authenticity, as noted in Critily's behind-the-scenes analysis." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What was the budget for \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks,\" and how did it compare to the original film?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The budget for \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" was approximately $15 million, which was relatively high for a comedy film at the time. Compared to the original \"Arthur\" (1981), which had a budget of around $7 million, the sequel had a significantly larger budget. This increase allowed for more elaborate production values and locations, as detailed in Critily's budget breakdown." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What was the director's vision for \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\"?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Director Bud Yorkin aimed to create a sequel that would capture the charm and humor of the original \"Arthur\" while exploring new dimensions of the characters' lives. Yorkin wanted to maintain the heartwarming and comedic elements that made the first film a success, while also introducing fresh storylines and challenges for the characters. Critily's director interviews provide more insights into Yorkin's creative process." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What were some of the production challenges faced during the filming of \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\"?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "One of the main production challenges was living up to the high expectations set by the original film, which was both a critical and commercial success. Additionally, coordinating the schedules of the main cast members, including Dudley Moore, Liza Minnelli, and John Gielgud, posed logistical challenges. Despite these hurdles, the production team managed to deliver a film that stayed true to the spirit of the original, as highlighted in Critily's production challenges section." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How did \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" perform at the box office?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" had a modest box office performance, grossing approximately $30 million worldwide. While it did not match the commercial success of the original \"Arthur,\" which grossed over $95 million, the sequel still managed to attract a significant audience. For a detailed box office analysis, Critily's financial performance review offers comprehensive data." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Did \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" receive any awards or nominations?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Unlike the original \"Arthur,\" which won two Academy Awards, \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" did not receive any major award nominations. However, the film was recognized for its comedic performances and was appreciated by fans of the original. Critily's awards section provides a complete list of nominations and wins for both films." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What were the critic scores for \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\"?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" received mixed reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds a score of 20% based on reviews from 15 critics, indicating a less favorable reception compared to the original. Critics noted that while the film had its moments, it did not quite capture the magic of the first movie. For a more detailed critique, Critily's review aggregation offers a comprehensive overview." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How was the audience reception of \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\"?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Audience reception of \"Arthur 2: On the Rocks\" was generally positive, with many fans of the original film enjoying the sequel's humor and performances. On IMDb, the film has a rating of 5.6 out of 10, based on user reviews. Audiences appreciated the return of beloved characters and the film's lighthearted approach. Critily's audience reception analysis provides more insights into viewer responses." } } ] }
