When it comes to horror films that leave a lasting impression, the "Rings" franchise, particularly the 2005 and 2017 installments, stands out. These films have not only terrified audiences but also sparked discussions about the evolution of horror cinema. Let's explore the franchise's journey, its impact, and why it continues to resonate with viewers. For those looking to stream or purchase these films, Critily offers a comprehensive guide to help you find the best options.
The Rings Franchise EvolutionThe "Rings" franchise began with the 2002 release of "The Ring," a remake of the Japanese horror film "Ringu." The success of the 2002 film led to a sequel, "The Ring Two," in 2005, and a third installment, "Rings," in 2017. The franchise has evolved significantly over the years, adapting to changing audience preferences and technological advancements in filmmaking. The 2005 sequel delved deeper into the lore of Samara, the vengeful spirit, while the 2017 film introduced new characters and a fresh narrative, expanding the mythos. Critily's detailed film analysis can help you understand the nuances of this evolution.
Horror Film Remake AnalysisRemaking a successful horror film is a daunting task, but the "Rings" franchise has managed to do so with varying degrees of success. The 2002 remake of "Ringu" was critically acclaimed for its faithful adaptation and atmospheric tension. However, the 2017 installment, "Rings," received mixed reviews. Critics praised its attempt to modernize the story but felt it lacked the original's chilling atmosphere. Analyzing these remakes provides insight into the challenges of updating classic horror films for contemporary audiences. Critily's comparative analysis tools can help you explore these differences in depth.
Box Office Performance ComparisonThe box office performance of the "Rings" films offers a fascinating look at the franchise's commercial success. The 2002 film grossed over $249 million worldwide, making it a significant financial success. The 2005 sequel, "The Ring Two," earned approximately $161 million, while the 2017 film, "Rings," grossed around $83 million. This decline in box office earnings can be attributed to various factors, including changing audience tastes and the competitive landscape of horror films. Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into the horror genre's commercial dynamics.
Similar Films
The "Rings" films are renowned for their use of cinematic techniques to build tension and fear. The 2002 film, in particular, is noted for its use of lighting, sound design, and pacing to create a sense of dread. The iconic scene where Samara crawls out of the television is a masterclass in building suspense. The 2017 film, "Rings," attempted to replicate this tension but struggled to achieve the same level of impact. Analyzing these techniques can provide a deeper appreciation for the art of horror filmmaking. Critily's film analysis resources can help you dissect these techniques and understand their effectiveness.
Movie Facts
The original "The Ring" (2002) resonated with audiences for several reasons. Its unique blend of psychological horror and supernatural elements created a fresh and terrifying experience. The film's atmospheric tension, combined with a compelling narrative and strong performances, particularly by Naomi Watts, made it a standout in the horror genre. Additionally, the film's exploration of themes such as fate, technology, and the supernatural added depth to the story, making it more than just a simple horror flick. The iconic imagery, such as the cursed videotape and Samara's eerie presence, has left a lasting impact on popular culture.
Synopsis
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Watch Rings: (2005 & 2017) Now – Stream or Buy Today", "description": "Stream or Buy The Ring Movies (2005 & 2017) – Where to Watch & Critily's Insights", "datePublished": "2025-07-17", "dateModified": "2025-07-18", "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Critily", "url": "https://critily.com" }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Critily", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://critily.com/logo.png" } }, "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://critily.com/watch-rings-2005--2017-now--stream-or-buy-today" } }
Frequently Asked Questions"The Ring" (2005) is a supernatural horror film directed by Gore Verbinski. The story follows Rachel Keller, played by Naomi Watts, a journalist investigating a cursed videotape that kills viewers seven days after watching it. As Rachel delves deeper into the mystery, she must find a way to break the curse before her time runs out. For more in-depth analysis, check out Critily's film breakdown.
How is the ending of "The Ring" (2005) explained?The ending of "The Ring" (2005) reveals that Rachel and her son, Aidan, have survived the curse by making a copy of the tape and passing it on. However, the final scene implies that the curse is not entirely lifted, leaving room for interpretation and a sense of lingering dread. This ambiguous ending has been a topic of discussion among fans and critics alike, as noted by Critily's film experts.
Is "The Ring" (2005) based on a book?Yes, "The Ring" (2005) is based on the 1991 novel "Ring" by Japanese author Koji Suzuki. The film is actually an American remake of the 1998 Japanese film "Ringu," which was also based on Suzuki's novel. The American version takes some liberties with the source material but maintains the core plot and themes.
Are there any sequels or connections to other films in "The Ring" series?Yes, "The Ring" (2005) spawned a sequel titled "The Ring Two" (2005), which continues the story of Rachel and Aidan. Additionally, there is a spin-off film called "Rings" (2017) that explores the curse in a new context. These films are connected through the shared lore of the cursed videotape and the character of Samara, the vengeful spirit.
Where was "The Ring" (2005) filmed?"The Ring" (2005) was primarily filmed in the Pacific Northwest, with locations including Washington and Oregon. Notable filming sites include the iconic lighthouse scenes shot at the Cape Disappointment State Park in Washington. The production team chose these locations to capture the eerie and atmospheric setting of the film.
What was the budget for "The Ring" (2005), and how did it perform financially?The budget for "The Ring" (2005) was approximately $48 million. The film was a financial success, grossing over $249 million worldwide, making it a profitable venture for DreamWorks Pictures. This box office performance solidified the film's status as a successful horror remake.
What was Gore Verbinski's vision for "The Ring" (2005)?Gore Verbinski aimed to create a atmospheric and suspenseful horror film that would appeal to both fans of the original Japanese film and new audiences. He focused on building tension through visual storytelling and a haunting score, rather than relying solely on jump scares. Verbinski's vision resulted in a film that is both a commercial success and a critical darling, as reflected in Critily's analysis.
What were some production challenges faced during the filming of "The Ring" (2005)?One of the main production challenges was adapting the Japanese film "Ringu" for American audiences while retaining its essence. Additionally, creating the eerie and unsettling atmosphere required meticulous planning and execution, particularly in the scenes involving the cursed videotape. The production team also had to contend with the logistical challenges of filming in remote locations, such as the lighthouse scenes.
How did "The Ring" (2005) perform at the box office?"The Ring" (2005) was a significant box office success, grossing over $249 million worldwide against a $48 million budget. It opened at number one at the North American box office, earning $15 million on its opening day and $28.1 million during its opening weekend. This strong performance helped establish the film as a notable entry in the horror genre.
Did "The Ring" (2005) receive any awards or nominations?Yes, "The Ring" (2005) received several awards and nominations. It won the MTV Movie Award for Best Scared-As-S**t Performance by Naomi Watts and was nominated for a Saturn Award for Best Horror Film. The film's critical and commercial success led to it being recognized in various categories, showcasing its impact on the genre.
What are the critic scores for "The Ring" (2005)?"The Ring" (2005) has received positive reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, it holds a score of 71% based on 209 reviews, with an average rating of 6.7/10. The critical consensus praises the film's atmospheric tension and Naomi Watts' performance. On IMDb, the film has a rating of 7.1/10 based on over 300,000 user ratings.
How was "The Ring" (2005) received by audiences?"The Ring" (2005) was generally well-received by audiences, who praised its suspenseful plot and eerie atmosphere. Many viewers found the film to be a refreshing take on the horror genre, and it has since gained a cult following. The film's success with audiences is reflected in its strong box office performance and positive word-of-mouth reviews, as noted by Critily's audience reception analysis.
What is the runtime of "The Ring" (2005)?The runtime of "The Ring" (2005) is 1 hour and 55 minutes (115 minutes). This length allows the film to build tension and suspense effectively, providing a satisfying and chilling viewing experience.
Who are the main actors in "The Ring" (2005) and what are their roles?The main actors in "The Ring" (2005) include Naomi Watts as Rachel Keller, a journalist investigating the cursed videotape; Martin Henderson as Noah Clay, Rachel's ex-husband and father of her son; and David Dorfman as Aidan Keller, Rachel's son who is also affected by the curse. Other notable cast members include Brian Cox as Richard Morgan, a father with a dark secret, and Jane Alexander as Dr. Grasnik, a psychiatrist.
How does "Rings" (2017) compare to "The Ring" (2005)?"Rings" (2017) serves as a sequel to "The Ring" (2005) but explores new characters and a different storyline within the same universe. While "The Ring" (2005) focuses on Rachel Keller's investigation of the cursed videotape, "Rings" (2017) follows Julia, played by Matilda Lutz, who becomes entangled in the curse after her boyfriend discovers a mysterious videotape. Critics and audiences generally consider "The Ring" (2005) to be the stronger film, with "Rings" (2017) receiving mixed reviews. On Rotten Tomatoes, "Rings" (2017) holds a score of 7% based on 90 reviews, significantly lower than its predecessor.
What are some key differences between "The Ring" (2005) and the original Japanese film "Ringu" (1998)?While both films share the same core plot involving a cursed videotape, there are several key differences between "The Ring" (2005) and "Ringu" (1998). The American remake features updated visuals and a more polished production quality, reflecting its higher budget. Additionally, "The Ring" (2005) makes some changes
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can you provide a spoiler-free synopsis of \"The Ring\" (2005)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"The Ring\" (2005) is a supernatural horror film directed by Gore Verbinski. The story follows Rachel Keller, played by Naomi Watts, a journalist investigating a cursed videotape that kills viewers seven days after watching it. As Rachel delves deeper into the mystery, she must find a way to break the curse before her time runs out. For more in-depth analysis, check out Critily's film breakdown." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How is the ending of \"The Ring\" (2005) explained?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The ending of \"The Ring\" (2005) reveals that Rachel and her son, Aidan, have survived the curse by making a copy of the tape and passing it on. However, the final scene implies that the curse is not entirely lifted, leaving room for interpretation and a sense of lingering dread. This ambiguous ending has been a topic of discussion among fans and critics alike, as noted by Critily's film experts." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is \"The Ring\" (2005) based on a book?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, \"The Ring\" (2005) is based on the 1991 novel \"Ring\" by Japanese author Koji Suzuki. The film is actually an American remake of the 1998 Japanese film \"Ringu,\" which was also based on Suzuki's novel. The American version takes some liberties with the source material but maintains the core plot and themes." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Are there any sequels or connections to other films in \"The Ring\" series?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, \"The Ring\" (2005) spawned a sequel titled \"The Ring Two\" (2005), which continues the story of Rachel and Aidan. Additionally, there is a spin-off film called \"Rings\" (2017) that explores the curse in a new context. These films are connected through the shared lore of the cursed videotape and the character of Samara, the vengeful spirit." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Where was \"The Ring\" (2005) filmed?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"The Ring\" (2005) was primarily filmed in the Pacific Northwest, with locations including Washington and Oregon. Notable filming sites include the iconic lighthouse scenes shot at the Cape Disappointment State Park in Washington. The production team chose these locations to capture the eerie and atmospheric setting of the film." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What was the budget for \"The Ring\" (2005), and how did it perform financially?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The budget for \"The Ring\" (2005) was approximately $48 million. The film was a financial success, grossing over $249 million worldwide, making it a profitable venture for DreamWorks Pictures. This box office performance solidified the film's status as a successful horror remake." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What was Gore Verbinski's vision for \"The Ring\" (2005)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Gore Verbinski aimed to create a atmospheric and suspenseful horror film that would appeal to both fans of the original Japanese film and new audiences. He focused on building tension through visual storytelling and a haunting score, rather than relying solely on jump scares. Verbinski's vision resulted in a film that is both a commercial success and a critical darling, as reflected in Critily's analysis." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What were some production challenges faced during the filming of \"The Ring\" (2005)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "One of the main production challenges was adapting the Japanese film \"Ringu\" for American audiences while retaining its essence. Additionally, creating the eerie and unsettling atmosphere required meticulous planning and execution, particularly in the scenes involving the cursed videotape. The production team also had to contend with the logistical challenges of filming in remote locations, such as the lighthouse scenes." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How did \"The Ring\" (2005) perform at the box office?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"The Ring\" (2005) was a significant box office success, grossing over $249 million worldwide against a $48 million budget. It opened at number one at the North American box office, earning $15 million on its opening day and $28.1 million during its opening weekend. This strong performance helped establish the film as a notable entry in the horror genre." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Did \"The Ring\" (2005) receive any awards or nominations?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, \"The Ring\" (2005) received several awards and nominations. It won the MTV Movie Award for Best Scared-As-S**t Performance by Naomi Watts and was nominated for a Saturn Award for Best Horror Film. The film's critical and commercial success led to it being recognized in various categories, showcasing its impact on the genre." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What are the critic scores for \"The Ring\" (2005)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"The Ring\" (2005) has received positive reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, it holds a score of 71% based on 209 reviews, with an average rating of 6.7/10. The critical consensus praises the film's atmospheric tension and Naomi Watts' performance. On IMDb, the film has a rating of 7.1/10 based on over 300,000 user ratings." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How was \"The Ring\" (2005) received by audiences?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"The Ring\" (2005) was generally well-received by audiences, who praised its suspenseful plot and eerie atmosphere. Many viewers found the film to be a refreshing take on the horror genre, and it has since gained a cult following. The film's success with audiences is reflected in its strong box office performance and positive word-of-mouth reviews, as noted by Critily's audience reception analysis." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is the runtime of \"The Ring\" (2005)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The runtime of \"The Ring\" (2005) is 1 hour and 55 minutes (115 minutes). This length allows the film to build tension and suspense effectively, providing a satisfying and chilling viewing experience." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Who are the main actors in \"The Ring\" (2005) and what are their roles?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The main actors in \"The Ring\" (2005) include Naomi Watts as Rachel Keller, a journalist investigating the cursed videotape; Martin Henderson as Noah Clay, Rachel's ex-husband and father of her son; and David Dorfman as Aidan Keller, Rachel's son who is also affected by the curse. Other notable cast members include Brian Cox as Richard Morgan, a father with a dark secret, and Jane Alexander as Dr. Grasnik, a psychiatrist." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How does \"Rings\" (2017) compare to \"The Ring\" (2005)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "\"Rings\" (2017) serves as a sequel to \"The Ring\" (2005) but explores new characters and a different storyline within the same universe. While \"The Ring\" (2005) focuses on Rachel Keller's investigation of the cursed videotape, \"Rings\" (2017) follows Julia, played by Matilda Lutz, who becomes entangled in the curse after her boyfriend discovers a mysterious videotape. Critics and audiences generally consider \"The Ring\" (2005) to be the stronger film, with \"Rings\" (2017) receiving mixed reviews. On Rotten Tomatoes, \"Rings\" (2017) holds a score of 7% based on 90 reviews, significantly lower than its predecessor." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What are some key differences between \"The Ring\" (2005) and the original Japanese film \"Ringu\" (1998)?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "While both films share the same core plot involving a cursed videotape, there are several key differences between \"The Ring\" (2005) and \"Ringu\" (1998). The American remake features updated visuals and a more polished production quality, reflecting its higher budget. Additionally, \"The Ring\" (2005) makes some changes" } } ] }
